London

June 28–29, 2027

New York

September 15–16, 2026

Berlin

November 9–10, 2026

Your Slack has a neurotypical bias

The communication habits that place disproportionate cognitive load on neurodivergent engineers, and a one-sprint audit with three specific rewrites you can deploy immediately.

Speakers: Rebecca Koniahgari

Register or log in to access this video

Create an account to access our free engineering leadership content, free online events and to receive our weekly email newsletter. We will also keep you up to date with LeadDev events.

Register with google

We have linked your account and just need a few more details to complete your registration:

Terms and conditions

 

 

Enter your email address to reset your password.

 

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.



Don't have an account? Click here to register
September 29, 2026
NYC 27 Pre sale ticket block image

Engineering teams don’t lose neurodivergent talent through hostile environments. They lose them through invisible ones.

According to the Tech Talent Charter’s survey of 230,000 tech workers, up to 50% of tech employees identify as neurodivergent when asked directly, while their employers estimate just 3%.

That gap isn’t a measurement problem. It’s a disclosure problem. Over half of neurodivergent workers have never told anyone at their company, because they’ve learned the environment wasn’t built for them.

When I built BRYGE AI, an award-winning AI communication assistant featured in Fast Company, I analysed the messages that 60 people sent to ADHD colleagues before and after using the tool.

The same patterns appeared repeatedly: urgency ambiguity, context-buried action items, and implicit tone that reads as passive aggression. None of the senders knew. All of the ADHD recipients experienced them as exhausting, anxiety-inducing, and sometimes career-threatening.

I call these Invisible Exclusion Patterns: communication habits so deeply embedded in neurotypical professional norms that the people generating them are structurally unable to see them without external help.

Research calls the underlying dynamic the Double Empathy Problem: the communication gap runs both ways, but the burden of bridging it falls almost entirely on neurodivergent workers.

That asymmetry is what this talk addresses.

The consequences for engineering teams are concrete. Neurodivergent engineers are misread as disengaged. High performers quietly labelled difficult. Retention conversations that should have been communication conversations.

And the cruel irony: the engineers most likely to be losing this battle are often the most technically exceptional members of your team, the ones whose cognitive difference is inseparable from their ability to solve problems nobody else can.

This talk introduces the Communication Burden Audit: a one-sprint framework that identifies where your team’s communication is placing disproportionate cognitive load on neurodivergent colleagues and gives you three specific rewrites you can deploy immediately.

No DEI training. No sensitivity workshops.

Just a systematic change to how your team writes to each other, with measurable impact on retention, velocity, and psychological safety.

Key takeaways

  1. The 3 Invisible Exclusion Patterns found repeatedly in neurotypical engineering communications, and the specific rewrites that eliminate them
  2. How to run a Communication Burden Audit in one sprint without disrupting delivery
  3. Why “action-first” message structure improves velocity for your whole team, not just neurodivergent members
  4. How to reopen retention conversations that were actually communication problems in disguise
  5. The leadership mindset shift from “they need to adapt” to “I need to design”, and why it’s the highest-leverage inclusion investment you can make